The Long Run Blog

Critical Thinking on Money, Finance, and Economics

“Be Your Own Banker”

Coincidentally, we received several emails asking about a concept called “be your own banker”. This has been around for decades, but apparently is now being remarketed as “Infinite Banking”, “Bottomless Banking” among other catchy names. Why pay interest to a bank when you can enjoy the “extraordinary benefits of creating your own banking system”? One site claims the method will “make you rich”. Does it sound too good to be true? Sound like a scam? Read on.

The idea works like this: open a whole life insurance policy and fund it as much as you can. Then when you need to borrow money, borrow it from the policy tax free and pay the interest back into the policy which is really to yourself. (Of course, you must firt have the money you want to borrow, which sort of defeats the purpose of borrowing anyway, but there’s more.) The benefits include the fact that you get life insurance coverage, the interest you earn from paying yourself accumulates tax-free, terms of the loan are up to you and available anytime. Is it a scam? Well, if your skeptical alarms start going off, good for you because it certainly sounds like a scam. However there is a bit of legitimacy to it, yet it doesn’t necessarily live up to the promises either. As usual, the devil is in the details.

A term life policy is basically nothing but pure insurance on your life for a set period or term. With term life, there is no accumulation, no loans, and no bells and whistles- it simply pays if you die within the term. A common form might be to insure a healthy person for $500,000 for 20 years at a cost of $600 per year. Die within those 20 years and your heirs get $500,000 provided you paid the premium. Die in year 21 and they get zip. Whole life on the other hand, does not have a term. As long as the policy is “current”, it will pay when you die whether that is at age 40 or 95.

A feature of whole life insurance (WL) is that it “accumulates” something called “cash value”. In essence, you put money into the policy determined on an actuarial basis to accumulate to the face value by a certain age. For example, you may contribute to a $100,000 WL policy enough so that the policy will have accumulated $100,000 in contributions and earnings by age 95 (it varies by policy; sometimes it is 105). Since that accumulation is the policy owner’s asset, the owner is allowed to borrow from it provided it gets paid back to the policy. Since it is a loan, there are no taxes on the proceeds. Since the earnings in the policy (including interest you pay on the loan) are part of life insurance, they are not taxed as income unless you cash out the policy. (This is where the tax-freeness comes from.)

So with be-your-own-banker, you borrow from yourself accumulating the interest tax free. Obviously there is a catch. The first hurdle is that every policy has multiple fees built into it. One fee is called the “mortality charge” which is the actuarial cost to insure your life. Think of it as the cost of term insurance- the pure cost to protect against early death, only the policy pays at any age so the mortality charge is much higher than with term insurance which expires. The second hurdle is that WL policies have other fees built into the policy like admin costs which essentially amount to profits for the insurance company. Total fees are usually higher in the early years of the policy too because the insurer has to recoup sales costs. All of these fees and costs mean that the policy will take 7-10 years typically to “break even”. That is, it takes 7-10 years of payments before the earnings on the accumulated cash value are large enough to pay the premium so you don’t have to. Think of it like a bank account- it has to have a large enough balance to earn enough interest to pay some bills.

Instead of making up numbers for the sake of this article, I have asked an insurance broker I know to provide a quote for a plain-vanilla $100,000 whole life policy on a 40-year old healthy non-smoking male. This policy has a fixed annual premium of $887. Such policies provide projections or “illustrations” estimating future performance. This particular policy accumulates cash value of $7,070 in year 10 at current rates (read: not reliable) of 4.7% and just $4,500 at the guaranteed minimum returns promised. A little quick math shows that $887 invested at 4.7% each year will compound to $11,001 in ten years. But what about the $100k of insurance coverage you get in addition to the cash value? Well, a 30-year term life policy for $100k might cost around $150 per year, so compounding $737 instead of $887 gets you $9,141- still far outpacing the policy. At this rate, it is going to take a long time to have enough in the policy to buy a car. In fact, it will take until year 22 to have $20,000 available.

Let’s say we accelerate this process and put $5,000 per year into the policy in addition to the $887 premium. I backed into the mortality charges and so was able to calculate a cash value of $24,000 after year 4. Now, we can borrow $20,000 from ourselves via the policy to buy a car and “be our own banker”. Recall that we have to pay the money back, with interest, to the policy. Assuming a 6% rate and a 5 year “loan” to ourselves, we pay $4748 for 5 years plus the regular $887 premium.

At the end of year 9, the loan is paid back and our policy is worth $35,283, which doesn’t seem so bad or is it? Remember, we paid $5,887 into the policy for 4 years, then $5,527 for another five years. This works out to a negative 9.5% annual return! Total paid in: $51,183; ending value: 35,283.

Perhaps most surprisingly, this compares ok with the “traditional” way of doing things: Term life for $150, invest the $5,737 at the same 4.7% for the first four years, then take a traditional loan for the $20,000 at 6% (while the first four years continues to compound). When all is said and done, you end up paying or saving $47,288 and having $32,428. The annual return on the traditional program works out to -9.2% annually- slightly better than the be your own banker system. So who is getting rich with such programs? You guessed it, the insurance salesperson.

About these ads

April 22, 2009 - Posted by | Personal Finance | , ,

9 Comments »

  1. I think I once had a banker try to sell me something like this. I had a moderate amount of cash that I had accumulated from some contract work I had done. I wanted to put it somewhere low risk for 6 months to a year so it would at least keep pace with inflation, so I decided to open a CD with it. The banker was very enthusiastic about trying to get me to borrow from my own CD and pay it back with interest, and insisted that I would be making money if I did that. The whole thing sounded like I would just be using my own money and the paying myself back, though. Needless to say, I never bothered with the loaning and repaying part of the whole deal. It was all very odd.

    Comment by dcardani | April 25, 2009 | Reply

  2. Yeah, but whole life is crap insurance anyway. How does it compare to Universal Life or Variable Life?

    Comment by kwittmeyer | April 26, 2009 | Reply

  3. Brett – Thanks for your time with this article. You have put my mind at ease. There are a couple of guys doing a heavy radio campaign on this Infinite Banking concept. I’m glad my “too good to be true” radar was working despite their excellent ability to generate excitement and curiosity. They end each program by inviting everyone to a free seminar. That is usually where I draw the line.

    After wrapping my head around your illustration, I’ve decided to save my money and pay cash for my next car. That is fine with me since it will be a long time before Pontiac makes a comeback.

    Comment by johnlewis1968 | April 29, 2009 | Reply

  4. @kwittmeyer- you can’t use UL or VL for this unless you choose the options to make it work just like WL, ie it needs steady returns.

    @john- don’t forget to look into the cheap financing. Borrowing at 0-3% usually makes sense since you can normally earn more than that in interest or investments. Keep that Pontiac in top condition, it could be a collector’s item someday now that the brand is disappearing. Sort of like Studebaker. ;-)

    Comment by Brett | April 29, 2009 | Reply

  5. brett, i’m curious what investment vehicle you are using to generate your tax free compounding returns in the “traditional” example where you buy term life insurance and invest the difference.

    Comment by slewzer | May 19, 2009 | Reply

  6. slewzer- I did not specify an investment vehicle, only assumed the same 4.7% return available in the WL policy to keep things apples to apples. However, the use of an IRA would achieve tax deferral, possibly even a tax deduction or tax-freeness in the case of a Roth.

    Comment by Brett | May 19, 2009 | Reply

  7. I have researched this process fully and in this article the writer is correct for the first 12 years or so. If you would continue this out 20 years and further the strategy using Whole life works much better than any other option. If you want to take a lot of risk in the market thinking you will get 10% return and you are able to do a Roth IRA then you may be better off doing the Roth. Most people do not have the discipline to continue the payments and to be somewhat locked in for a hand full of years. We all want everything right now and we do not have the patience to be in it for the long haul.

    Comment by jjschmidt | October 6, 2009 | Reply

  8. In order to understand the value of this process requires an understanding of our banking system. Most people have no idea how the banking system works. Because if they did, they would realize the power of this system. It has nothing to do with investing and everything to do with lending. The contract is the key component, everything else is of no consequence.

    Comment by peterkavalas | November 30, 2009 | Reply

    • I have no idea what you are talking about (what does it have to do with the banking system?), but from the tone of your comment and the language you use (“power”, “contract”), my guess is that you are an insurance agent who promotes this system.

      Comment by Brett | November 30, 2009 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: