Some thoughts on China blasting a Congressional Report
Here is what drives me nuts about international politics and politics in general: there doesn’t seem to be any no real, genuine, honest discussion between parties. Maybe behind closed doors, though there doesn’t seem to be evidence of it. If so, the people of the world are apparently deemed too stupid to handle the truth. Perhaps they are? Regardless, here is another example of blatant hypocrisy and lying.
According to the AP, the U.S. released a Congressional report which accuses China of deliberately undervaluing its currency, the yuan. That much is fact. Yet China reacted strongly calling this report a “cold war mentality” and that this report “constitutes interference in Beijing’s internal affairs”. The Chinese Foreign Ministry added “we urge this so-called commission to …instead exert greater efforts to build mutual trust and cooperation”. Oh, really?
Let’s recap the facts and lies here. First, China’s currency manipulation is fact, not a political opinion. They either manipulate it or not and it has been proven they do. Second, being an international matter, currency manipulation is definitely not an “internal affair”. Framing it otherwise is nothing more than political lying, otherwise known as propaganda. Hey, if you say it loud enough and often enough, it must be true, right?
Let’s move on to the “cold war mentality” comment. Well, it should be a cold war mentality. The Chinese overtly spy on us, regularly getting people into Los Alamos to steal nuclear secrets; they actively conduct cyber warfare on the U.S. (just ask Google); China consistently thwarts any international efforts at reining in rogue states like Iran and North Korea, despite pretty unanimous world agreement; they maintain aggressive posture towards our allies Taiwan and Japan. In addition, China has cornered the market on rare earth metals (which are essential components in all technology) and is using that as a negotiating lever the way the Middle East uses oil. Only oil comes from other places and has alternatives. Rare earth metals have no alternatives.
So why wouldn’t we view them as a cold war type adversary? Oh right, because we want their business! But on this front, U.S. companies are constantly at a disadvantage. How? For starters, China insists on requiring “technology transfers” where a foreign company is required to build a plant or R&D facility in China in order to do business in there. Fine, but those operations are required to teach, train and transfer know-how to the Chinese, who then promptly steal it. China also turns a blind eye to patent protection, copywrites and piracy of intellectual property.
Finally, we come to the actual currency issue. The injustices above are committed in one direction I might add (the U.S. does little with regard to one-sided policy against China, though admittedly we are no angels in the world wide scheme of things). With the scales tipped so far in favor of China, they also feel the need to manipulate the exchange rate. That’s right- even with all the embarrassing bullying, we’re also letting them give us an economic “wedgie” in front of the class too! My sense of fairness is being tortured.
Now for the ultimate hypocrisy, China’s actual comment on the currency issue was “[China] contends that a stronger yuan will not ease America’s yawning trade deficit.” Well if that’s true, why not just let it float freely? As I’ve said many times, I am all for free trade. Yet “free” in this sense means Webster’s definition “not determined by anything beyond its own nature or being”. Is that what our trade with China is? No, it is manipulated, managed and biased- a one way street. That isn’t fair, free or good for for anyone but China. Mutually beneficial relationships, in the context of world affairs, are far superior to being cold war adversaries. Yet China only acts selfishly, like a child trying to take a mile when parents give an inch. Isn’t it time we change the game? If they won’t play fair on their own, we should stop giving them what they want and act like the adult in the room.
7 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (3)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (3)
- August 2011 (6)
- July 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

Because even if China gets 90% of the benefit, and the US only 10%, though you might whine and flail about it not being fair, you aren’t willing to give up 10% of a very large number?
Everyone is acting like adults, they are acting in their own best (albeit short term) interests. Welcome to the modern day.
That assumes we net benefit. Free trade always produces a net benefit, but this isn’t free trade as I’ve noted. It is very plausible that we aren’t experiencing a NET benefit, especially when you consider the long-term trade off of intellectual property, expertise/engineering in exchange for short-term profit.
If there weren’t at least a short-term net benefit, why would anyone be there? (I’m not trying to be rhetorical, I know of no reason myself)
There are other issues with incentivizing long-term vs. short-term payoffs which are pretty endemic though.
China has (apparently) decided to peg its currency to the dollar.
Brett, I guess you’d prefer that China have some other monetary policy. But aren’t their monetary policy decisions their own business? Why should we have any sway over how China decides when and how to create their money?
I agree that we’d all be better off if we all opened our markets. But I think the “currency manipulation” issue is a red herring.
Red herring for what? I think my point is being mistaken.
China says it doesn’t manipulate- it does
China says we’re acting cold-war like- in fact, they are
China says currency exchange is an internal matter- by definition, it is manipulation of their currency in exchange for someone else’s, thus by definition, it is not internal
I’m for free trade; China isn’t. China wants manipulated trade. All I’m saying is that if it is free trade we’re after, then let it be free.
The currency manipulation issue is a red herring for the real issues, which are tariffs and other trade barriers. If the Chinese want to manipulate their currency so we pay less for the stuff they make for us… well, overall, all the better for us!
Megan McArdle has some relevant, rational comments here: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/11/quantitative-easing-here-and-there/66671/
I think Megan is supporting my argument nicely, albeit in a slightly different manner.
By the way, China often REQUIRES a US multinational to open plants and/or R&D facilities in China as a condition for doing business there. That is a backhanded, covert form of tariff/trade barrier. The US doesn’t do that. So how are we the bad guys again?